Call of Duty 4 5v5 - Round 5 Fixtures and Results

[KONSPIRACY]

The Call of Duty 5v5 5th round (WB Semi-final) fixtures must be played & results reported by Sunday 17th February.

You are to play a best of 5 gametype series as specified in the Call of Duty 5v5 Rules (http://community.matchbox360.co.uk/showthread.php?t=5076).

The maps and gametypes to be played are as follows:

Search and Destroy: Backlot
Domination: Strike
Team Deathmatch: District
Search and Destroy: Downpour
Domination: Vacant


The Round 5 fixtures are as follows:

Five to One vs iD | MB360
teamqG.Consto vs TeamqG.Decerto


Please use this thread to arrange your fixtures in the following format:

FIXTURE NUMBER: (ie 1-2 as above)
TEAM NAME:
TEAM CAPTAIN:
EMAIL or MSN:


Please post your Call of Duty 4 5v5 Round 5 Results using the following format:

FIXTURE NUMBER: (ie 1-2)
TEAM NAMES: (ie team1 vs team2)
WINNING TEAM:
RESULT: (ie 3-0 or 2-1)
Search and Destroy: state aggregate score (ie 8-6)
Domination: state aggregate score (ie 342-400)
Team Deathmatch: state aggregate score (ie 1500 - 850)
Search and Destroy: state aggregate score (ie 8-6) (if applicable)
Domination: state aggregate score (ie 342-400) (if applicable)
COMMENTS:


Please note: we would appreciate it if all teams concerned play with good sportsmanship and refrain from the use of any glitches or cheats. Should you believe the opposition has cheated in anyway, then you must supply clear evidence so MatchBox360 admin can take the appropriate action.

Any team found fielding non-registered players is in breach of the MatchBox360 rules and will subsequently be disqualified. It is the responsibility of each team to ensure opponents only play with fully registered team mates. As such, please supply evidence (screen shot or game links) to prove any use of illegal players.

To ensure your opponents only field registered players, please check the Call of Duty 4 5v5 Confirmed Teams List (http://community.matchbox360.co.uk/showthread.php?t=4899).

[iD Rumsey]

iD vs 5.1 or psn

please add iD Rumsey to sort out when this match can be played

[Nuked]

iD vs 5.1 or psn

please add iD Rumsey to sort out when this match can be played

getting played tonight at 8, ill add you if we win

[iD Rumsey]

nice one and good luck

[.Deadbringr.]

qG vs qG will sort out .. no worry if you just post the results straight away + sportmanship will be good ;)

[CazuaLL]

Yeh yet another tourney where there will be no qG vs qG final, happened in x-league too, sucks but will be a good game!

[KONSPIRACY]

Both teams can still make final...thats why theres a losers bracket! ;)

[HeXBLiTz]

Ye Rumsey i got you on MSN so we can do **** on there

[InfamouS]

woow Decerto again no lol o well will be a good semi final goodluck to all teams still left in.

[HeXBLiTz]

woow Decerto again no lol o well will be a good semi final goodluck to all teams still left in.

I know right turned out the exact same as teh XLeague first round lol

atleast this time theres a LB to go to for the teams that loose this week

[Infidel]

at least there shudnt be any forfeits this round :)

[Earlzii]

Search and Destroy - Downpour ? is that a joke ?

[KONSPIRACY]

No. Whats your problem with that? The only issue with Downpour S&D as far as I'm aware is the MMG (which will be banned at XL).

Not that it matters in the slightest but Downpour is 1 of only 4 maps selected by MLG for their COD4 S&D.

[.Deadbringr.]

Search and Destroy - Downpour ? is that a joke ?

we played it for Xleague to Earl .. its not that bad :)

[Infidel]

downpour is pretty terrible, the whole map comes down to two choke points either side of the main building and a crawlspace under a wall, one of which can be easily covered by two people (at the most) by the MMG and the other 3 cover the other side. Even in matchmaking the defending team normally wins at least 2 out of 3 if the teams are even remotely matched, and with a well thought out defense its almost inpregnable save for a couple of lucky grenades. even then the attacking team is most vulnerable from nades as its got to cover the open ground up to the main building, and quick if it hopes to rush the opposition to get in front of the choke points before the opposition is set up.

by choosing downpour its kinda like saying that the entire map is going down to a 50:50 toss of the coin by who gets to defend last. im sure there are much better maps that could have been chosen.

[.Deadbringr.]

downpour is pretty terrible, the whole map comes down to two choke points either side of the main building and a crawlspace under a wall, one of which can be easily covered by two people (at the most) by the MMG and the other 3 cover the other side. Even in matchmaking the defending team normally wins at least 2 out of 3 if the teams are even remotely matched, and with a well thought out defense its almost inpregnable save for a couple of lucky grenades. even then the attacking team is most vulnerable from nades as its got to cover the open ground up to the main building, and quick if it hopes to rush the opposition to get in front of the choke points before the opposition is set up.

by choosing downpour its kinda like saying that the entire map is going down to a 50:50 toss of the coin by who gets to defend last. im sure there are much better maps that could have been chosen.

i played this Map for Xleague that means 10 rounds attacking ( we lost knife round ) and after words 10 rounds defending .. you can see much tactics and you see straight away what works on this level .. its not as bad as you say .. ofcourse nates are best use, it will be your best friend but if you are a really good team you can winn attacking too .. we losed attacking 4-6 ofcourse it just s8cks to attack but we had to defend too we wonn 7-0 straight away .. its a skilled map not the best dont get me wrong .. but just play it and you will see it is not THAT bad .. wetwork is even worse ;)

[Infidel]

yea id agree wetwork is pretty bad and is mainly a frag fest, and id agree you can have some good games on downpour once the choke points have been broken but this tourney isnt like xleague where theres 10 straight rounds each way, its only 3 and theyre alternate so its harder to learn the tactics of the opposition and break them. you proved my point in your post that you won 7-0 defending because you are a good team (we played you the other day on GB but u werent on) and lost 4-6 when attacking, showing that there is a big advantage when defending. and ill bet that when attacking you lost the first couple in a row whilst you learnt their positions. i dont know who you played but ill also bet that they didnt adapt to your attacks and change defensive positions enough allowing you to break it once youd learnt it.

with a stong defense that a good team such as yourselves could employ it will be etremely hard for another good team like your opponents consto to break in only 3 rounds, and ill stake money that the score will be 4-3 and it come down to luck of who gets to defend last. with two reasonably even matched teams i cant see anyone but the defenders winning. if played over more rounds where its a case of who can break the defense most of out of 10 rounds it could be reasonably competitive and interesting.

[KONSPIRACY]

I think you're forgetting that you have to play each other twice per gametype and the actual score is the aggregate of both. If it ends in a tie then carry on with the rest of the games accordingly as stated in the rules.

[Infidel]

i suppose that kind of improves the situation but its not the same as xleague as theres other action in between and id suggest that if it goes to 3-3 both times then each team gets to defend once each as if one team gets lucky and defends twice then its almost all over.

[KONSPIRACY]

That would happen naturally if you play each other twice.

Unfortunately the only thing wrong with COD4 S&D is the inherent fault when it comes to ties as one team will always have the advantage of being the defending team in the decider.

[Infidel]

That would happen naturally if you play each other twice.

i thought it was done randomly and independently with 50:50 chances each time, if so it would give a 50% chance of one team getting to defend both times (25% each).

[KONSPIRACY]

Well I dont like the in game system however its determined tbh as one team will always have an advantage (whether its random or not) as the defending team. This is even more so in that case at XL where you would only get to play the first to 4 or 8 rounds once per map, so if it is a tie going into the last round then the best option is to have a playoff switching rounds until one team wins by 2 clear rounds.

Anyways, this is going off topic...get your games arranged and played asap please! :D

[Infidel]

well the only other game is qG vs qG so i dont think they should have a problem arranging it so its probably ok to go a bit off topic.

the advantage isnt always with the defending team, yes defending means you can sit there and hide waiting, whilst the attackers have to push forward at some point but on certain maps like countdown (i know its awful) the attackers can get to the objective just as quick as the defenders making for a much faster paced game. also sitting there waiting isnt going to work for long against the top teams as they will quickly learn where you hide and will often break this defense with grenades.

[.Deadbringr.]

well the only other game is qG vs qG so i dont think they should have a problem arranging it so its probably ok to go a bit off topic.

the advantage isnt always with the defending team, yes defending means you can sit there and hide waiting, whilst the attackers have to push forward at some point but on certain maps like countdown (i know its awful) the attackers can get to the objective just as quick as the defenders making for a much faster paced game. also sitting there waiting isnt going to work for long against the top teams as they will quickly learn where you hide and will often break this defense with grenades.

agree on both points .. dont forget Crosfire .. if you attack you have a big atvantence
just trow some nades and plant the bom quickly .. nobody can winn of that.

futher i think it is good that maps are discused but you will always have some problems with it .. i think its very good of MB360 to just keep Downpour in it because these are the basic rules and no 1 really likes it, but you need to learn it. and I just hope they will never pick Wetwork because that is the only map that is totally not skilled.

@ Infidel : we played against Sqr so was a good clan aswell.. they are very respectfull good team to play against.

[Infidel]

i kinda liked wetwork tbh, once the grenades are all thrown it can be quite the tactical standoff but in a high pressure game with lots at stake it would be boring as hell as no one would take the risk of movng forward.

i hate it now though even in matchmaking

[HeXBLiTz]

the tie break goes to defend/attack to the team that attacked or defended first i think not sure tho.

and Kon in the LB if we meet a team from the WB we allreayd played do we have a lead in terms of what we beat them score wise b4?

[KONSPIRACY]

Nah not in this online tournament mate. Obviously I'm aware of those rules but they havent been enforced in this particular tournament.

[HeXBLiTz]

ok m8 j/w thats all

[iD Rumsey]

iD vs 5.1 will be played on monday at 8 oclock if thats ok kon,

both teams have agreed to this

i just confirmed it with nuked

[KONSPIRACY]

Ok np :cool:

[CazuaLL]

qG vs qG should be played tomorow

[CazuaLL]

teamqG.Consto have broken up so give teamqG.Decerto the win!

[.Deadbringr.]

teamqG.Consto have broken up so give teamqG.Decerto the win!

jep .. teamqG.Decerto winns on a Default

[HeXBLiTz]

OMG al these roster changes halfway through a tourny its a shame :(

[.Deadbringr.]

OMG al these roster changes halfway through a tourny its a shame :(

jeah it is :( ..

[KONSPIRACY]

With regards to team changes...

Obviously theres been a few major transfers this week between the top teams which have resulted in teams either splitting or line-ups being changed significantly. Its a shame that such changes happen at a critical time in an online tournament and by definition of the tournament rules line-up changes are no longer allowed.

I believe all teams remaining in the winners bracket are aware of whats happened and the circumstances surrounding these changes so in the best interests of the tournament and for the teams remaining, the decision to allow new rosters to be played will be at the discretion of your opponents.

[.Deadbringr.]

jep thats why teamqG.Decerto winns on default .. our other team left

[KONSPIRACY]

Yeah I know :(

[.Deadbringr.]

Yeah I know :(

at least i will always have you close in my hearth :) (L)

[HeXBLiTz]

FIXTURE NUMBER: 1
TEAM NAMES: iDentity Vs Five to One
WINNING TEAM: iDentity
RESULT: 3-0 (no point playing last 2 gametypes)
Search and Destroy: 8-1 (iD Win)
Domination: 481 - 213 (iD Win)
Team Deathmatch: 1500 - 1100
Search and Destroy: Did Not Play
Domination: Did Not Play
COMMENTS: was a good game imo we did some stupid **** on SnD and our Lack of Dom experiance hurt us. was really fun untill iD did the Through the Wall glitch on Dom but as thats not banned here theres nothing we can do so fair play to them for exploiting it even tho we were sporting enough to let them use TWO new players to there roster. (even tho only one left)

[iD Rumsey]

iD win 3-0 good game
and thanks again for letting us use our new players

was a good game anyway

[Nuked]

yeh good games iD, games werealot closer than they look on Snd, alot of 1vs1 moments

[iD South]

yeah good game once again thanks for letting us use them guys, sorry we didnt have a full team on alot of **** has been up in the air but will be sorted soon. my 5 vs 1 on backlot was sexc ;)