ACTUAL Killzone 2 Screenshots & Trailer

[Renegade]

http://i.i.com.com/cnet.g2/images/2007/191/928377_20070711_screen001.jpg

http://i.i.com.com/cnet.g2/images/2007/191/928377_20070711_screen003.jpg

http://i.i.com.com/cnet.g2/images/2007/191/928377_20070711_screen004.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/kill16.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/kill15.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/kill13.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/kill10.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/kill9.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/kill7.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/kill6.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/kill5.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/bscap039.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/bscap042.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/bscap043.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/E3-TrailerUSKILLZONE-09.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/E3-TrailerUSKILLZONE-09-1.jpg





Trailer: http://gametrailers.com/player/21490.html

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/LiquidMetal14/53gh06a.gif

Killzone 1 sucked, so I won't hype up KZ2's gameplay. It looks absolutely stunning graphics wise though.

[BlueHoopedMoose]

Killzone 1 sucked, so I won't hype up KZ2's gameplay. It looks absolutely stunning graphics wise though.

Really? I watched the trailer and felt positively "meh" about it to be honest.

[Renegade]

The SD trailer yes. The HD trailer is absolutely blinding. Plus, you can see what I see on the screenshots - and quite frankly nothing I've seen on the 360 matches it aside from (just barely) Gears of Snore.

[Azure]

Thats what $40,000,000 and 1st party gets you.

[Pirate Balloon]

This looks pretty badass.

[Azure]

Gears > Killzone.

http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s50/ssj_jaypee/gow2.jpg

As long as we are talking about graphics, I found the trailer meh as well to be honest.

[Renegade]

Azure you find everything that doesn't interest you 'meh'. I hated Killzone 1 and am a big fan of my 360 (note - FAN, not FANBOY) but Killzone 2 looks sweet. And IMO it looks better than Gears. Although I'm never constricted by my hatred of that game anyway.

But again, it seems like you're comparing and criticising art atyles, not actual technical graphics. In terms of graphics I'm of the opinion that Viva Pinata is the best I've seen on the 360 - and Gears is just below. It looks ok, but there is no colour (the only comparible problem with KZ2), the texture pop-in is astonishing, the animation is glitchy, the blood looks stupid, and the textures are over used. I'm not saying KZ2 is the best looking game ever, but come on, these are pre-alpha screenshots and they look better and more varied than Gears.

To be honest, so far the only people I've seen that don't agree the KZ2 looks astounding are the ones that don't like anything Sony does, regardless of what it actually is.

[BlueHoopedMoose]

To be honest, so far the only people I've seen that don't agree the KZ2 looks astounding are the ones that don't like anything Sony does, regardless of what it actually is.

Don't go tarring me with that brush.

[Renegade]

I'm just saying. It looks great - and definitely has better graphics than Halo 3 at this point. Just because the art style doesn't suit what you want, doesn't mean it looks bad.

[BlueHoopedMoose]

And I'm just saying "Don't tar me with the same brush"

To be honest, so far the only people I've seen that don't agree the KZ2 looks astounding are the ones that don't like anything Sony does, regardless of what it actually is.

If I want sweeping statements I'll speak with Tao!

[Azure]

Who is talking about art style? I'm not.

Graphical quality to me is the gap between what something ought to look like in a given environment, and what it DOES look like.

Gears has better graphics imo than Killzone - nothing to do with art styles at all - you could fill it full of concrete traingles and circles for all I care, if the player models look more like they belong there then that is all there is to it.

Killzone looks to me like a mixture of resitance and FEAR - it looks good, great even. But gears puts it's characters into the environent in a better manner. And whoops - I think gears of war sucks dick.

Don't throw the baby at me just because I don't like something you are exctited about. I fail to see how the accusative of "Anything you are not interested in you think is Meh" works - No **** batman.

[Renegade]

*deleted, can't be arsed with another debate against a never-wrong*

[Azure]

I'm not excited about Killzone so **** off generalising.


To be honest, so far the only people I've seen that don't agree the KZ2 looks astounding are the ones that don't like anything Sony does, regardless of what it actually is.

Wheeeee.

How can you imply me as a moron when you think you're onto something by saying

Azure you find everything that doesn't interest you 'meh'

I hate to be the one to break it to you in 2007 but if someone isn't interested in something it does usually get "meh" - if it is moronic to say "no **** batman" to that then I really cannot envisage what sort of help you need.

I went to the trouble of downloading a 200+ MB version of the trailer before posting so yeah I do know what I am talking about - the HD version looks scruffier than the SD one, it has it's dirty laundry on show. They created an intro with no overheads that is in the same vein as the cinematic - granted. I still think the ingame graphics look meh - sue me.

But again, it seems like you're comparing and criticising art atyles, not actual technical graphics. In terms of graphics I'm of the opinion that Viva Pinata is the best I've seen on the 360 - and Gears is just below.

... You are talking about art styles here not graphics. Something that has "The best graphics" is something that is more true to life than another. You have the two mixed the wrong way in your head hombre - you prefer Viva pinata's style but gears has better graphics. :)

*deleted, can't be arsed with another debate against a never-wrong*

I need a Nemesis. Apply within

Muahahahaha.

[Renegade]

You're not a Nemesis - you're boring. It's like a brick wall, doesn't matter what points are given against you, you're going to be right because you cannot be wrong. Your debateing style is that of not getting a better point across, but belittling your opponent until he simply cannot be bothered to argue back. Hence me deleting the post before you even bothered - I knew your comeback would resort to belittlement before you had even posted it.

My complaint line of 'something doesnt interest you is meh' is a valid one - Gears doesn't interest me. Still think it looks good. Killzone 2 doesn't interest me. Still think it looks good. I 100% agree that the gameplay looks meh. I don't want the game, it's not something I'm interested in. Graphically, it looks ****ing awesome. I want Halo 3 very very much, but I think graphically it's meh compared to KZ2 as it stands. Like I said about Gears - it's designed for the ADD generation. As is your 'in 2007 if something doesnt interest us its meh' comment. Fast-food lifestyle, can't be arsed to look any deeper, I'll just ignore it and make an unimpressed little noise.

And again with the 'I still think the graphics look meh' comment from you. Despite your previous post saying 'Killzone 2 looks good, great even'. You're flip-flopping more than a ****ing clown.

*edit* Nothing personal, just don't like your debate style one bit. Plus, no point me getting into a huge debate. As of 5 minuts time, it's very doubtful I will be on Matchbox or the internet for a few weeks!

[Azure]

Gears doesnt interest me - it looks better than Killzone.

Killzone doesnt interest me - it looks less than Gears of war

Is that ok for you?

[Renegade]

Valid subjective opinion, no problem.

It was your meh to great then back to meh transformation which blew your whole point out of the water ;)

[Azure]

I find it meh when weighed against itself.

I find it good looking from my chair, but good looking insofar as "omfgkillzone2100%confirmedrealtimetrailer2yearsago bysonyexecutive may as well mean it looks like ****. This game was never meant to look good - or great, it was meant to look like liquid sex and imo it doesn't so it gets a meh.

PGR4 looks good, but the graphics still get meh, where is the step up?

[I know killzone 2 as ingame 2 years ago was debunked but that isnt the point - that was the mark they had to hit, minimum for anyone to take them seriously]

[Renegade]

Convenient ;)

[Azure]

What is convenient?

http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/8421/killzownedgifxo3.gif

[kurosaki7]

If I want sweeping statements I'll speak with Tao!

Ha ha, damn right . . . however on topic, why are you not impressed and Azure all I can say is how can you even mention Gears in relation to Killzone?

For one the 'jaggies' that plagued gears do not appear to be there, the reactions to getting shot are realistic in comparison too. The blood the AI the background effects that most games are lacking. It is 'not' as good as everyone is making out, but it is a step above gears based on that video, whether it will be the same in the final build who knows but my judgement from viewing that is it will definately surpass the trash that was GoW (which is not hard but I also think it an equal for Halo3 visuals wise and surpasses it when it comes to immersion and environments)

Its got my attention anyway, and is a big + next to me to hold onto my PS3.

[Azure]

The player models look sketched in and not part of the environment - thats about it. It wrecks the credibility of a "realistic game" for me.

[kurosaki7]

Yes and no, I see what you mean, the close up of the guy near the end and he looks out of place, but I think it is just a few of the models atm for me, the first enemies, the ones hiding behind the pillars and the close up getting shot in the face all appear seamless.